Singapore Anti Gambling Ad spoof ending
Sheldon Adelson has made clear his intentions to go on the offensive against Internet gambling.
Now it's time for the poker community to go on the offensive against him.
New Jersey State Sen.
Raymond Lesniak, the biggest proponent of Internet gambling in the Garden State, has already written to relevant parties in New Jersey letting them know of Adelson's intentions.
He's a powerful, well-funded guy, but that never scared me away from any fight.
I have a pretty good track record on click to see more side, and more importantly have the economy of the state of New Jersey on my side.
We have thousands of jobs at stake.
According to Lesniak, former New York Gov.
George Pataki is one of the lobbyists hired by Adelson.
There previously was hope that Adelson, like former Sen.
Jon Kyl before him, might be convinced to draw a distinction between Internet poker and other forms of gambling.
We already have three states that have authorized it and another dozen states looking into it.
We already have regulated Internet gaming in other forms like lotteries and horse racing.
He's well behind the times in his opposition.
While he's well funded, he'll have a hard time singapore anti gambling bill 2020 the tide here in the U.
Lesniak expects that Adelson singapore anti gambling bill 2020 find a legislator to introduce a federal bill attempting to ban Internet gambling, including poker, in 2014, but that the New Jersey Senators would block any attempts to move such a bill.
The future of economic activity, whether gaming or anything else, is over the Internet, and singapore anti gambling bill 2020 cannot shut down the Internet.
It's an unwinnable fight.
No one else is calling for a ban on Internet gambling.
He might be able to make a bigger impact at the state level, particularly with states that are on the fence regarding online poker.
This could hurt New Jersey by delaying movement from states that could potentially partner to singapore anti gambling bill 2020 their online gambling operations through Atlantic City.
Over time, he could also make progress on changing public opinion against online poker.
We have to be worried that singapore anti gambling bill 2020 can influence enough Americans that all the work we've done up until now could be nullified.
Naturally, this seems hypocritical coming from someone who made his fortune through casinos.
He separates online gambling as being easy to access while gambling at his casinos takes effort and planning.
None of this is a surprise coming from Adelson.
He also claims to have studies that indicate online singapore anti gambling bill 2020 will hurt brick-and-mortar casinos, though most of his competitors disagree and will participate in Internet gaming in Nevada and New Jersey.
Pappas thinks the financial angle is really Adelson's top concern.
He points out that Adelson already is offering online wagering.
The sports book at the Venetian, one of Adelson's properties, advertises a that allows people to place bets anywhere in Nevada.
I think everyone can read between the lines of what he's saying, that this is more a business concern for him than it is a moral one.
Since he made his intentions in opposing Internet gambling known, some individual poker players have come out saying they will never again play at an Adelson property.
It's a sentiment supported by Pappas, but he said the PPA won't attempt to organize a boycott of Adelson casinos.
Given that poker players are notoriously difficult to organize, that they make up a miniscule part of the customer base for his Las Vegas casinos, and that the Las Vegas properties represent a small amount of Sands' revenues compared to Asia, a boycott isn't likely to make the desired impact.
The Internet cannot be forced back into the bottle � nor can market demand.
We support pragmatism and strong regulation of online gaming that protects consumers, prevents underage play, ensures the integrity of the games and empowers law enforcement.
New government efforts to prohibit online gaming will unintentionally strengthen black market providers, create more risk for American consumers, including children, and drive U.
We appreciate divergent viewpoints and welcome a healthy discussion on click at this page complex issue.
Lead photo courtesy of.
We'll have continuing coverage of iGaming in New Jersey this month.
Get all the latest PokerNews updates on your social media outlets.
Subscribe to our newsletter Get the latest poker news, poker strategies, and special offers sent directly to your inbox.
I confirm that I am over the age of 18 years old.
We will use your personal data to email you necessary information the PokerNews updates.
Our use and processing of your personal data, is governed by the and available on the PokerNews.
See you in Nottingham� 18 mins.
Combo draws return to being valid� 43 mins.
Among other things, visitors will find a daily dose of singapore anti gambling bill 2020 with the latest poker news, live reporting from tournaments, exclusive videos, podcasts and so much more.
Sign up and confirm your email to subscribe to our newsletter and get started: I confirm that I am over the age of 18 years old.
Need MORE Bonuses and Games?
Be the first one to know when new EXCLUSIVE bonuses and games are available.
Sign up to get all singapore anti gambling bill 2020 updates it only takes 30 seconds.
Submit I confirm that I am over the age of 18 years old.
No, Thanks To see how much we care about your private info, check our.
Game on: What BSV offers online gambling
For those addicted to gambling, know that the house always win, if not why do. Alternative 2020 Article ? 45 Quotes on Change and Changing Our Attitudes.
In my opinion you are not right. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you commit an error. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
It is a pity, that now I can not express - it is very occupied. I will be released - I will necessarily express the opinion on this question.
What do you mean?
Certainly. And I have faced it.
It is interesting. Tell to me, please - where to me to learn more about it?
Yes, really. It was and with me.
I can not participate now in discussion - there is no free time. But I will return - I will necessarily write that I think.
Yes, the answer almost same, as well as at me.
Thanks, can, I too can help you something?
It seems magnificent idea to me is
I think, that you commit an error. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM.
As much as necessary.
Matchless topic, it is very interesting to me))))
As much as necessary.
In it something is. I thank for the help in this question, now I will not commit such error.
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
In my opinion you are not right. I suggest it to discuss. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.
It is a pity, that now I can not express - it is compelled to leave. But I will return - I will necessarily write that I think.
I am sorry, that has interfered... I here recently. But this theme is very close to me. I can help with the answer. Write in PM.
I consider, that you commit an error. I can prove it. Write to me in PM.
It does not approach me.
I am sorry, it not absolutely approaches me. Who else, what can prompt?
This idea has become outdated