Blackjack Session Big side bet action!
Hello, I went to the casino two days ago and saw this guy playing blackjack, putting most of his money on the pair square side bet pays 10:1 if your first two cards are pairs, 20:1 if they are same suit.
He would hit at least one pair EVERY.
I could not find any specific betting pattern to his bets although he did not bet on pairs every hand.
He also only seems to play in tables without shuffle machines.
My question is pair side bet blackjack there is a way to make money betting on pair squares in the long run or this guy just got lucky?
What do you guys think?
If he's betting that much on the side bet, you can bet that he's also lost that much on another day with the same strategy.
Let's do the math to figure out the house edge.
Assume a 6 deck game, which has 312 cards, or 24 of each card.
When this happens you get 10x payout.
When this happens you get 20x payout.
That guy got lucky.
There is no provable method of counting side bets to an effective degree.
If you're playing blackjack with the intent of making money, learn to card count, and at the least learn basic strategy.
Lucky Lucky and Lucky Ladies has been debated for years about whether or not its vulnerable to advantage play.
Lets be honest about it, from a psychological perspective.
Those that suggest it can be vulnerable 99.
Depending on the count that they use, adding a sidecount to track LLu and LLa can be done at no real challenge to the counter, but being able to nail down a true just click for source has yet to be mathematically proven.
There are guys like KJ and T3 that would warn against its volatility.
KJ from an experienced perspective, T3 from a mathematical one.
Ask those two about it as they are really the two heads of the counting field.
I've long counted with an emulation of KJ's approach, but with T3's visit web page in my mind, if that makes sense.
You don't know what you are talking about.
Lucky Ladies has pair side bet blackjack mathematical true count strike point which depends on the numbers of decks and the paytable involved but is generally TC 5-8 for hi lo.
TC 5 is for when the double deck paytable is used for 8 deck games, such as at Casino Montreal.
Lucky Lucky requires a separate count 6's 7's and 8's are the most valuable cards for EOR obviously.
The advantage is easily simulated and mathematically proven.
LLu and LLa aren't offered on ANY double deck game from Colorado to Pittsburgh, Tip of Michigan down to the Gulf.
Source: I just drove it 3 months ago, visited every casino in each of the states, scouted every table and made a small fortune doing it.
If the strike point is at TC5 on DD, imagine the TC6 strike point on 8D.
It amounts to like, 13 cents per hour earned, on a modest spread, on a table with solid rules.
Ultimately, the point isn't that it is or isn't possible, its that its not really worth the time to do, as the situations aren't readily available to be used at a decent margin.
Do you have CVCX?
Simulate any good game like 6 deck 1 deck cut off and you will see these counts happen something like 3% of the time, or once every 30 rounds.
I don't know why I even bother trying to reason with you god damn mouth breathers.
But none of them are located check this out America.
I think this is where we are going to have our problem.
Your head is buried in CVCX, not on the real game.
If you only pair side bet blackjack these counts 3% of the time, which is the point I mentioned, then its very likely that, also, I'll only see it 3 days out of 100.
More importantly, if I work 20 days a month, that's 3 days over 5 months that I'll see that count, which sounds eerily like what I had mentioned, seeing source only a handful of times over a 3-6 months period for a full time counter.
I'll be the first to admit that I've seen it multiple times in a day, many times, but also that I've also gone days, weeks, and even a month without ever seeing that count.
Judging by your posts, your propensity to quote CVCX, and your history on the 3 forums, I'm betting you have very little relative experience to a 60 hour a week full time counter.
Not saying you can't do what you claim, but you claimed a 300k bankroll not long ago on BJTF, what happened to it?
Or was it not yours and you were actually part of a team bankroll?
If you're the real deal, and you can verify the existence of something close to 100% score, you'll make more in my referral than you'll find in commitment on this forum.
Also, if you can prove the existence of such a game, I'll gladly stake your bankroll to play it.
If you only see these counts 3% of the time, which is the point I mentioned, then its very likely that, also, I'll only pair side bet blackjack it 3 days out of 100 no, that is not how math works.
If you're the real deal, and you can verify the existence of something close to 100% score, " Score isn't click the following article in percentile form.
SCORE is in whole numbers.
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but there isn't a score value over 100, right?
Edit: Also, LULZ Medellin.
I'll give you all of my money if you can last 3 months in Medellin without being killed, literally, as well as leaving the country with all of your winnings.
I'm absolutely aware of that not being how math works, guy, I'm just putting it into a different frame of focus so we can see eye to eye on this because I'm a guy who might play 60 hours a week, and you're a guy looking for an investor, head buried in CVCX looking for your next opportunity.
INSANE SIDE BET WINS!!! LIVE BLACKJACK!
Answer 1 of 26: Do any of the casinos in Vegas offer blackjack with a side bet? The Cesears in Windsor Ontario has a perfect pairs blackjack table. Im hoping i ...
It is remarkable
The matchless message ;)
Certainly. I join told all above.
Also that we would do without your very good idea
I am sorry, that has interfered... I here recently. But this theme is very close to me. I can help with the answer.
I agree with you, thanks for the help in this question. As always all ingenious is simple.
I join. And I have faced it. Let's discuss this question.
Tomorrow is a new day.
I think, that you are not right. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
It is a pity, that now I can not express - there is no free time. I will be released - I will necessarily express the opinion on this question.
In my opinion you are mistaken. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will discuss.
Warm to you thanks for your help.
I well understand it. I can help with the question decision. Together we can find the decision.
On mine, it not the best variant
I confirm. It was and with me. We can communicate on this theme.
Very remarkable topic