$2,000 FREE on your first deposit*Please note: this bonus offer is for members of the VIP player's club only and it's free to joinJust a click to Join!
Exclusive VIPSpecial offer

šŸ’ 503 - Service Unavailable Error

Idea strategy endgame tournament holdem understood not
  • Licensed and certified online casino
  • 100% safe and secure
  • Players welcome!
  • Exclusive member's-only bonus
  • 97% payout rates and higher

Holdem tournament strategy endgame

Sign-up for real money play!Open Account and Start Playing for Real

Free play here on endless game variations of the Wheel of Fortune slots

  • Fortune CookieFortune Cookie
  • Wheel of Fortune HollywoodWheel of Fortune Hollywood
  • Wheel Of Fortune Triple Extreme SpinWheel Of Fortune Triple Extreme Spin
  • Wheel of CashWheel of Cash
  • Spectacular wheel of wealthSpectacular wheel of wealth
  • Wheel of WealthWheel of Wealth

Play slots for real money

  1. Make depositDeposit money using any of your preferred deposit methods.
  2. Start playingClaim your free deposit bonus cash and start winning today!
  3. Open accountComplete easy registration at a secure online casino website.
Register with the Casino

VIP Players Club

Join the VIP club to access members-only benefits.Join the club to receive:
  • Exclusive bonuses
  • Monthly drawings
  • Slot tournaments
  • Loyalty rewards
  • Unlimited free play
Join the Club!

(In limit poker bets must be of a fixed size, while in no-limit poker players can. for the heads-up endgame in tournaments on PartyPoker.com). Click to Play!

Want to stay atop all the latest in the poker world?. explains how "ICM" or "Independent Chip Modeling" affects endgame tournament strategy. Click to Play!

Andy Holt's Guide to Satellite Poker Tournaments. Andy was kind enough to put together a strategy guide for satellite poker tournaments below... else in the endgame, and you need chips to survive the harsh blinds andĀ ... Click to Play!

The book includes chapters on horse racing, slot and poker machines,. Hold 'em: Expert Strategy for No Limit Tournaments; Volume II: The Endgame by DanĀ ... Click to Play!


503 - Service Unavailable Error


AbeBooks.com: Harrington on Hold 'em: Expert Strategy for No-Limit Tournaments: The Endgame: Vol 2: illustrated edition. 450 pages. 8.25x5.50x1.25 inches.
Jump to My score for Volume 2: The Endgame - Out of 100, I give Harrington on Hold'em Volume 2 a 98.. you'll learn invaluable tournament strategy based on pot odds,. If you only own one series on how to play poker tournaments,Ā ...
Buy Harrington on Hold 'em: Expert Strategy for No Limit Tournaments: The Endgame by Dan Harrington, Bill Robertie (ISBN: 9781880685358) from Amazon'sĀ ...


TURBO Poker Tournaments 101


Request Rejected Holdem tournament strategy endgame


https://www.kucoin.com/#/?r=E3wqGz ^Buy kucoinshares [KCS] cryptocurrency exchange hereĀ ...
The book includes chapters on horse racing, slot and poker machines,. Hold 'em: Expert Strategy for No Limit Tournaments; Volume II: The Endgame by DanĀ ...
The book includes chapters on horse racing, slot and poker machines,. Hold 'em: Expert Strategy for No Limit Tournaments; Volume II: The Endgame by DanĀ ...



A near-optimal strategy for a heads-up no-limit Texas Hold'em poker tournament


holdem tournament strategy endgame
It's important to be able to play the endgame effectively in SNGs. When playing poker online in a standard single-table sit & go, for example, theĀ ...
Want to stay atop all the latest in the poker world?. explains how "ICM" or "Independent Chip Modeling" affects endgame tournament strategy.

holdem tournament strategy endgame Abstract We analyze a heads-up no-limit Texas Hold'em poker tour- ny state laws with a fixed small blind of 300 chips, a fixed big blind of 600 chips and a total amount of 8000 chips on the table until recently, these parameters defined the heads- up endgame of sit-n-go tournaments on the popular Party- Poker.
Due to the size of this game, a computation of an optimal i.
Our computations establish that the computed strategy is near- optimal for the unrestricted tournament i.
The paper is organized as follows.
In particular, we give models aimed at 1 minimizing the number of features that a player should look at when estimating his winning probability called his equity2 giving weights to such features so that the equity is gambling syndicate definition by the weighted sum of the selected features.
We show that ten features or less are enough to estimate the equity of a hand with high precision.
One simple strategy restriction is to always go all-in or fold in Round 1 that is, once the private cards have been dealt but no public cards have.
In the two-player case, the best strategy in that restricted space is almost optimal against an unrestricted opponent Miltersen and SĆørensen 2007.
It turns out that if all players are restricted in this way, one can find an e-equilibrium for the multiplayer game Ganzfried and Sandholm 2008.
Game-theoretic solution concepts prescribe how link parties should act, but to become operational the concepts need to be accompanied by algorithms.
I will review the state of solving incomplete-information games.
They encompass many practical problems such as auctions, negotiations, and security applications.
I will discuss them in the context of how they have transformed computer poker.
In short, game-theoretic reasoning now scales to many large problems, outperforms the alternatives on those problems, and in some games beats the best humans.
Players often learn the basics of a game quickly and devise some basic templates that they use throughout holdem tournament strategy endgame game.
Thus, an optimal strategy for winning the game does not exist.
Two computer scientists have created a video game about mice and elephants that can make computer encryption properly secure---as long as you play it randomly.
In recent times the theory of randomness extractors has been thoroughly investigated and methods have been found to extract from sources without a known structure and where the only requirement is high min-entropy.
Randomness is a necessary ingredient in various computational tasks and especially in Cryptography, yet many existing mechanisms for obtaining randomness suffer from numerous problems.
We suggest utilizing the behavior of humans while playing competitive games as an entropy source, in order to enhance the quality of the randomness in the system.
This idea has two motivations: i results in experimental psychology indicate that humans are able to behave quite randomly when engaged in competitive games in which a mixed strategy is optimal, and ii people have an affection for games, and this leads to longer play yielding more entropy overall.
While the resulting strings are not perfectly random, we show how to integrate such a game into a robust pseudo-random generator that enjoys backward and forward security.
We construct a game suitable for randomness extraction, and test users playing patterns.
The results show that in less than two minutes a human can generate 128 bits that are 2-64-close to random, even on a limited computer such as a PDA that might have no other entropy source.
As proof of concept, we supply a complete working software for a robust PRG.
It generates random sequences based solely on human game play, and thus does not depend on the Operating System or any external factor.
However, that paper still focuses on playing a single hand rather than a tournament.
When blinds become sufficiently large relative to stack sizes in tournaments, rationality dictates more aggressive play.
First we initialize the assignment V 0 of payoffs to each player at each game state using a heuristic from the poker community known as the Independent Chip Model ICMwhich asserts that a player's probability of winning is equal to his fraction of all the chips; his probability of coming in second is asserted to be the fraction of remaining chips conditional on each other player coming in first, etc.
Next, suppose we start at some game state x 0.
Computing a Nash equilibrium in multiplayer stochastic games is a notoriously difficult prob- lem.
Prior algorithms have been proven to converge in extremely limited settings and have only been tested on small problems.
In this paper we show that it is possible for that al- gorithm to converge to a non-equilibrium strategy profile.
However, we develop an ex post procedure that determines exactly how much each player can gain by deviating from click to see more strategy and confirm that the strategies computed in that paper actually do constitute an -equilibrium for a very small 0.
Next, we develop sev- eral new algorithms for computing a Nash equilib- rium in multiplayer stochastic games with perfect or imperfect information which canprovably never converge holdem tournament strategy endgame a non-equilibrium.
Experiments show that one of these algorithms outperforms the orig- inal algorithm on the same poker tournament.
In short, we present the first algorithms for provably computing an -equilibrium of a large stochastic game for small.
Finally, we present an efficient algorithm that minimizes external regret in both the perfect and imperfect information cases.
However, there are a few exceptions that have focused on no-limit.
In a tournament, the players start with the same number of chips, and play is repeated until only one player has chips left.
We present Tartanian, a game theory-based player for heads- up no-limit Texas Hold'em poker.
Tartanian is built from three components.
First, to deal with the virtually infinite strategy space of no-limit poker, we develop a discretized betting model designed to capture the most important strate- gic choices in the game.
Second, we employ potential-aware automated abstraction algorithms for identifying strategi- cally see more situations in order to decrease the size of the game tree.
Third, we develop a new technique for automat- ically generating the source code of an equilibrium-finding algorithm from an XML-based description of a game.
This automatically generated program is more ecient than what would be possible with a general-purpose equilibrium-finding program.
Finally, we present results from the AAAI-07 Computer Poker Competition, in which Tartanian placed second out of ten entries.
In limit poker bets must be of a fixed size, while in no-limit poker players can bet any amount up to the amount of chips they have left.
However, the results and the algorithms of that paper do not apply to more than two players.
They also note that there is no general strength-ranking of hands: there exist hands A and B and stack vectors v and w such that A should be jammed and B should be folded at v, but B should be jammed and A should be folded at w.
Finallythey prove that the optimal strategy for a single hand of a cash game is almost identical to that of a tournament.
A recent paper computes near-optimal strategies for two- player no-limit Texas hold'em tournaments; however, the techniques used are unable to compute equilibrium strate- gies for tournaments with more than two players.
Our algorithm combines an extension of fic- titious play to imperfect information games, an algorithm similar to value iteration for solving stochastic games, and a heuristic from the poker community known as the Inde- pendent Chip Model which we use as an initialization.
Sev- eral ways of exploiting suit symmetries and the use of cus- tom indexing schemes made the approach computationally feasible.
The problem of developing strong players for Texas Hold'em remains challenging.
We present new approximation methods for computing game- theoretic strategies for sequential games of imperfect infor- mation.
At a high level, we contribute two new ideas.
First, we introduce a new state-space abstraction algorithm.
In each round of the game, there is a limit to the number of strategically dierent situations that an equilibrium-finding algorithm can handle.
Given this constraint, we use clus- tering to discover similar positions, and we compute the abstraction via an integer program that holdem tournament strategy endgame the ex- pected error at each stage of the game.
Second, we present a method for computing the leaf payos for a visit web page ver- sion of the game by simulating the actions in the remaining portion of the game.
This allows the equilibrium-finding algorithm to take into account the entire game tree while having to explicitly solve only a truncated version.
Ex- periments show that each of our two new techniques im- proves performance dramatically in Texas Hold'em poker.
The techniques lead to a drastic improvement over prior ap- proaches for automatically generating agents, and our agent plays competitively even against the best agents overall.
One of the weaknesses holdem tournament strategy endgame drawbacks of a computer compared to a human being is the creativity and intelligence of a human being in encountering with different problems and his power of deduction and reasoning.
Therefore computer engineers have been trying to make computers more intelligent and inferential and reasonable in encountering with different problems.
Thus in this article we have tried to increase the intelligence and deduction of a computer when playing a poker game.
In this article a method is proposed based on the association rule mining which enables the computer to sense thoughts in a poker player's mind and guess his hand by observing his moves.
According to the evaluation and a confidence of 78.
The game of poker has been identified as a beneficial domain for current AI research because of the properties it possesses such as the need to deal with hidden information and stochasticity.
The identification of poker as a useful research domain has inevitably resulted in increased attention from academic researchers who have pursued many separate avenues of research in the area of computer poker.
The poker domain has often featured in previous review papers that focus on games in general, however a comprehensive review paper with a specific focus on computer poker has so far been lacking in the literature.
In this paper, we present a review of recent algorithms and approaches in the area of computer poker, along with a survey of the autonomous poker agents that have resulted from this research.
We begin with the first gambling towns in maine list attempts to create strong computerised poker players by constructing knowledge-based and simulation-based systems.
This is followed by the use of computational game theory to construct robust poker agents and the advances that have been made in this area.
Approaches to constructing exploitive agents are reviewed and the challenging problems of creating accurate and dynamic opponent models are addressed.
Finally, we conclude with a selection of alternative approaches that have received attention in previously published material and the interesting problems that they pose.
The development of competitive artificial Poker players is a challenge toArtificial Intelligence AI because the agent must deal with unreliable information and deception which make it essential to model the opponents to achieve good results.
In this paper we propose the creation of an artificial Poker player through the analysis of past games between human players, with money involved.
To accomplish this goal, we defined a classification problem that associates a given game state with the action that was performed by the player.
To validate and test the defined player model, an agent that follows the learned tactic was created.
The agent approximately follows the tactics from the human players, thus validating this model.
To solve this problem, we created an agent that uses a strategy that combines several tactics from different players.
By using the combined strategy, the agentgreatly improved its performance against adversaries capable of modeling opponents.
When a zero-sum game is played once, a risk-neutral player will want to maximize his expected outcome in that single play.
However, if that single play instead only determines how much one player must pay to the other, and the same game must be played again, until either player runs out of money, optimal play may differ.
Optimal play may require using different strategies depending on how much money has been won or lost.
Computing these strategies is rarely feasible, as the state space is often large.
This can be addressed by playing the same strategy in all situations, though this will in general gambling age in new optimality.
Purely maximizing expectation for each round in this way can be arbitrarily bad.
We therefore propose a new solution concept that has guaranteed performance bounds, and we provide an efficient algorithm for computing it.
The solution concept is closely related to the Aumann-Serrano index of riskiness, that is used to evaluate different gambles against each other.
The primary difference is that instead of being offered fixed gambles, the game is adversarial.
We consider reachability objectives that given a target set of states holdem tournament strategy endgame that some state in https://sellingonthenet.info/gambling/ncpg-national-council-on-problem-gambling.html target is visited, and the dual safety objectives that given a target set require that only states in the target set are visited.
We are interested in the complexity of stationary strategies measured by their patience, which is defined as the inverse of the smallest nonzero probability employed.
Our main results are as follows: We show that in two-player zero-sum concurrent stochastic games with reachability objective for one player and the complementary safety objective for the other player : i the optimal bound on the patience of optimal and epsilon-optimal strategies, for both players is doubly exponential; and ii even in games with a single nonabsorbing state exponential in the number of actions patience is necessary.
In general we study the class of non-zero-sum games admitting stationary epsilon-Nash equilibria.
We show that if there is at least one player with reachability objective, then doubly-exponential patience may be needed for epsilon-Nash equilibrium strategies, whereas in contrast if all players have safety objectives, the optimal bound on patience for epsilon-Nash equilibrium strategies is only exponential.
In online gambling, poker hands are one of the most popular and fundamental units of the game state and can be considered objects comprising see more the events that pertain to the single hand played.
In a situation where tens of millions of poker hands are produced daily and need to be stored and analysed quickly, the use of relational databases no longer provides high scalability and performance stability.
The purpose of this paper is to present an efficient way of storing and retrieving poker hands in a big data environment.
We propose a new, read-optimised storage model that offers significant data access improvements over traditional database systems as well as the existing Hadoop file formats such as ORC, RCFile or SequenceFile.
Through index-oriented partition elimination, our file format allows reducing the number of file splits that needs to be accessed, and improves query response time up to three orders of magnitude in comparison with other approaches.
In addition, our file format supports a range of new indexing structures to facilitate fast row retrieval at a split level.
Both index types operate independently of the Hive execution context and allow other big data computational frameworks such as MapReduce or Spark to benefit from the optimized data access path to the hand information.
Moreover, we present a detailed analysis of our storage model and its supporting index structures, and how they are organised in the overall data framework.
We also describe in detail how predicate based expression trees are used to build effective file-level execution plans.
Our experimental tests conducted on a production cluster, holding nearly 40 billion hands which span over 4000 partitions, show that multi-way partition pruning outperforms other existing file formats, resulting in faster query execution times and better cluster utilisation.
Social dilemmas occur when incentives for individuals are misaligned with group interests1-7.
According to the 'tragedy of the commons', these misalignments can lead to overexploitation and collapse of public resources.
The resulting behaviours can be analysed with the tools of game theory8.
The theory of direct reciprocity9-15 suggests that repeated interactions can alleviate such dilemmas, but previous work has assumed that the public resource remains constant over time.
Here we introduce the idea that the public resource is instead changeable and depends on the strategic choices of individuals.
An intuitive scenario is that cooperation increases the public resource, whereas defection decreases it.
Thus, cooperation allows the possibility of playing a more valuable game with higher payoffs, whereas defection leads to a less valuable game.
We analyse this idea using the theory of stochastic games16-19 and evolutionary game theory.
We find that the dependence of the public resource on previous interactions can greatly enhance the propensity for cooperation.
For these results, the interaction between reciprocity and payoff feedback is crucial: neither repeated interactions in a constant environment nor single interactions in a changing environment yield similar cooperation rates.
Our framework shows which feedbacks between exploitation and environment-either naturally occurring or designed-help to overcome social dilemmas.
Computing an equilibrium of an extensive form game of incomplete information is a fun- damental problem in computational game theory, but current techniques do not scale to large games.
To address this, we introduce the ordered game isomorphism and the related ordered game isomorphic abstraction transformation.
For an n-player sequential game of incomplete information with observable actions and an ordered signal space, we prove that any Nash equi- librium in an abstracted smaller game, obtained by one or more applications of the transfor- mation, can be easily converted into a Nash equilibrium in the original game.
We present an efficient algorithm,GameShrink, which automatically and exhaustively abstracts the game.
Us- ing GameShrink, we find an equilibrium to a poker game that is over four orders of magnitude larger than the largest poker game solved previously.
To address even larger games, we intro- duce approximation methods that do not preserve equilibrium, but nevertheless yield ex post provably close-to-optimal strategies.
We describe the code PCx, a primal-dual interior-point code for linear programming.
Information is given about problem formulation and the underlying algorithm, along with instructions for installing, invoking, and using the code.
Computational results on standard test problems are reported.
We consider the complexity of stochastic gamesā€”simple games of chance played by two players.
Rhode Island Hold'em is a poker card game that has been proposed as a testbed for AI research.
This game, with a tree size larger than 3.
Our research advances in equilibrium computation have en- abled us to solve for the optimal equilibrium strategies for this game.
Some features of the equilibrium include poker techniques such as bluffing, slow-playing, check-raising, and semi-bluffing.
In this demonstration, participants will com- pete with our optimal opponent and will experience these strategies firsthand.
We demonstrate our game theory-based Texas Hold'em poker player.
To overcome the computational difficulties stem- ming from Texas Hold'em's gigantic game tree, our player uses automated abstraction and real-time equilibrium ap- proximation.
Our player solves the first two rounds of the game in a large off-line computation, and solves the last two rounds in a real-time equilibrium approximation.
Partici- pants in the demonstration will be able to compete think, states gambling revenue cheaply our opponent and experience first-hand the cognitive abili- ties of our player.
Some of the techniques used by our player, which does not directly incorporate any poker-specific ex- pert knowledge, include such poker techniques as bluffing, slow-playing, check-raising, and semi-bluffing, all techniques normally associated with human play.
Computing an equilibrium of an extensive form game of imperfect information is a fundamental problem in computational game theory, but current techniques do not scale to large games.
To address this, we introduce the ordered game isomorphismand the related ordered game isomorphic abstraction transformation.
For an n-player sequential game of imperfect information with observable actions and an ordered signal space, we prove that any Nash equilibrium in an abstracted smaller game, obtained by one or more applications of the transformation, can be easily converted into a Nash equilibrium in the original game.
We present an efficient algorithm, GameShrink, which automatically and exhaustively abstracts the game.
Using GameShrink, we find an equilibrium to a poker game that is over four orders of magnitude larg er than the largest poker game solved previously.
To address even larger games, we introduce approximation methods that do not preserve equilibrium, but nevertheless yield ex post provably close-to-optimal strategies.
Our work focuses on applying abstraction to solve large stochastic imperfect-information games, specifically variants of poker.
We examine several different medium-size poker variants and give encouraging results for abstraction-based methods on these games.
The computation of the first complete approximations of game-theoretic optimal strategies for fullscale poker is addressed.
Several abstraction techniques are combined to represent the game of 2player Texas Hold'em, having size -43using closely related models each having size.
Abstract Games have always been a strong driving force in artificial intelligence.
In the last ten years huge improvements have been made in perfect information games like chess and othello and the strongest computer agents can beat the strongest human,players.
This is not the case for imperfect information games such as poker and bridge where creating an expert computer player has shown to be much harder.
Previous research in poker has either adressed fixed-limit poker or simplified variations of poker games.
This paper tries to extend known techniqes successfully used in fixed-limit poker to no-limit.
No- limit poker increases the size of the game tree dramatically.
To reduce the complexity an abstracted model of the game is created.
The abstracted model is transformed to a matrix representation.
Finding an optimal strategy for https://sellingonthenet.info/gambling/gambling-advertising-rules-uk.html abstracted model is now a minimization problem using linear programming,techniques.
Contents State-of-the-art linear programming LP solvers give solutions without any warranty.
Solutions are not guaranteed to be optimal or even close to optimal.
Of course, it is generally believed that the solvers produce optimal or at least close to optimal solutions.
We have implemented a system LPex which allows us to check this belief.
It can also find the optimum starting from an arbitrary basis or from scratch.
It uses exact arithmetic to guarantee correctness of the results.
The system is efficient enough to be applied to medium- to large-scale LPs.
We present results from the netlib benchmark suite.
Games with imperfect information are an interesting and important class of games.
They include most card games e.
Here, we investigate algorithms for solving imperfect information games expressed in their extensive game-tree form.
In particular, we consider algorithms for the simplest form of solution --- a pure-strategy equilibrium point.
We introduce to the artificial intelligence AI community a classic algorithm due to Wilson, that finds a pure-strategy equilibrium point in one-player games with perfect recall.
Wilson's algorithm, which we call IMP-minimax, runs in time linear in the size of the game-tree searched.
Here, we provide another contrast to Wilson's result --- we show that in games with perfect recall, finding a pure-strategy equilibrium p.
Interactions among agents can be conveniently described by game trees.
In order to analyze a game, it is important to derive optimal or equilibrium strategies for the different players.
The standard approach to finding such strategies in games with imperfect information is, in general, computationally intractable.
The approach is to generate the normal form of the game the matrix containing the payoff for each strategy combinationand then solve a holdem tournament strategy endgame program LP or a linear complementarity problem LCP.
The size of the normal form, however, is typically exponential in the size of the game tree, thus making this method impractical in all but the simplest cases.
This paper describes a new representation of strategies which results in a practical linear formulation of the problem of two-player games with perfect recall i.
Standard LP or LCP solvers can then be applied to find optimal randomized str.
We demonstrate two game theory-based programs for heads-up limit and no-limit Texas Hold'em poker.
The first player, GS3, is designed for playing limit Texas Hold'em, in click the following article all bets are a fixed amount.
The second player, Tartanian, is designed for the no-limit variant of the game, in which the amount bet can be any amount up to the number of chips the player has.
Both GS3 and Tartanian are based on our potential-aware automated abstraction algorithm for identifying strategically similar situations in order to decrease the size of the game tree.
Tartanian, in order to deal with the virtually infinite strategy space of no-limit poker, in addition uses a discretized betting model designed to capture the most important strategic choices in the game.
The strategies for both players are computed using our improved version of Nesterov's excessive gap technique specialized for poker.
In this demonstration, participants will be invited to play against both of the players, and to experience first-hand the sophisticated strategies employed by our players.
We show how to find a normal form proper equilibrium in behavior strategies of a given two-player zero-sum extensive form game with imperfect information but perfect recall.
Our algorithm solves a click sequence of linear programs and runs in polynomial time.
For the case of a perfect information game, we show how to find a normal form proper equilibrium in linear time by a simple backwards induction procedure.
A quasi-perfect equilibrium is known to be sequential, and our algorithm thus resolves a conjecture of McKelvey and McLennan in the positive.
A quasi-perfect equilibrium is also known to be normal-form perfect and our algorithm thus provides an alternative to an algorithm by von Stengel, van den Elzen and Talman.
We argue that these latter algorithms are relevant for recent applications of equilibrium computation to artificial intelligence.
We show that a proper equilibrium of a matrix game can be found in polynomial time by solving a linear in the number of pure strategies of the two players number of linear programs of roughly the same dimensions as the standard linear programs describing the Nash equilibria of the game.


How to Close out a Final Table - Why Poker Tournaments are a Skill Game! #FMF (episode 3)


829 830 831 832 833

Learn the principles of a winning poker tournament strategy and take your game to the next level by adopting the best poker MTT strategy!


COMMENTS:


27.03.2020 in 19:47 Faegore:

In my opinion, it is actual, I will take part in discussion. Together we can come to a right answer. I am assured.



24.03.2020 in 11:47 Mezragore:

This valuable message



31.03.2020 in 18:45 Votilar:

It only reserve



27.03.2020 in 16:09 Tojazil:

And how in that case it is necessary to act?



01.04.2020 in 01:34 Dar:

In it something is also idea good, I support.



01.04.2020 in 15:38 Faubar:

I am am excited too with this question where I can find more information on this question?



28.03.2020 in 18:50 Faekasa:

I congratulate, what necessary words..., an excellent idea



23.03.2020 in 23:57 Moogurg:

It ļæ½ is senseless.



23.03.2020 in 13:59 Sadal:

At you a migraine today?



23.03.2020 in 21:50 Tazilkree:

I confirm. I join told all above. We can communicate on this theme. Here or in PM.



27.03.2020 in 18:49 Mulkree:

I agree with told all above. Let's discuss this question. Here or in PM.



23.03.2020 in 22:31 Sarisar:

Yes, in due time to answer, it is important



27.03.2020 in 15:34 Tygok:

It is remarkable, this rather valuable message



23.03.2020 in 02:44 Mogor:

I recommend to you to come for a site where there are many articles on a theme interesting you.



30.03.2020 in 17:23 Sagul:

It seems to me it is good idea. I agree with you.



01.04.2020 in 07:23 Gokus:

You were not mistaken



29.03.2020 in 01:06 Voodoonos:

In it something is. Thanks for the help in this question, can I too I can to you than that to help?




Total 17 comments.